Q: Did citizen "John Doe" et al. cause C.I.A. resources to be mis-marshaled prior to 9/11 thereby increasing Al Qaeda's odds re its 9/11 attack?
NOTE: On information and belief†, whether my above question should be deemed "rhetorical" depends upon discovery; I hereby request discovery and request to incorporate herewith
my FOIA Request filed in May of 2007 with the Central Intelligence Agency. Moreover, this Indictment is hereby filed: (a) 'In Forma Pauperis' (sans an affidavit in support thereof); and (b) via HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP)†† due to this Citizen A.G.'s prior experience with what may be termed "unprofessional activities" on the parts both of LLE officials in
 , M.O./U.S. (situs of instant filing) and of justices/magistrates in my previously-domiciled jurisdictions re which mis- and/or malfeasances I do at times retain evidence.†††
|
The above is one of my favorite illustrated comic book frames. It was created by an artist named
Rand Holmes
back in 1984. Republished here under the auspices of applicable Fair Use provisions of
Title 17 U.S.C..
The depicted Allied sea captain reminds me of a person who appears to have appeared before me (in the guise of a private-practice psychologist) sub nom.
"Dr. R. Scott Shumate, Psy.D." (hereinafter "Mr. Shumate"), [now and/or formerly] a Chief Psychologist with the C.I.A. (Behavioral Sciences Directorate /u/ Cofer Black) and C.I.F.A. (S.E.S. grade) tasked with various and sundry counterterrorism activities. The Luftwaffe pilot reminds me of myself, though only by dint of flyboy aspects thereof ~ I's no "Good German". |
DEDICATORY: "Fight Spiritual Wickedness in Very High Places." This page is dedicated to one Gen. William "Billy" Mitchell, a True Visionary of Air-Power Force Projection at a time when comfortably-ensconced superiors felt him a dangerous lunatic of sorts and eventually even court-martialed the po' sumbitch.
Co-dedicated: Mr. Boyington who formed his own flight squadron
Praise be to Bill who paved w/ paws for men like Mr. Boyington
|
|
I was once field-interrogated by Mr. Shumate hence my deployment of Mr. Holmes' artwork. Unfortunately, I never had a snowball's chance in Hell of brandishing my J.D. and returning Mr. Shumate the favor in a court of law. Which left me wondering,
why the Hell was Mr. Shumate questioning me "about a dame" [as her fiancé's (or hubbie's) low-level "ringer"] and about my (former) web site which was effusively critical of
News Corp.
[Mr. Shumate qua FOX News' high-level "moonlighting stooge"]? During the ill-advised interrogation, Mr. Shumate was false-flagged [see here]
as a private-practice psychologist ostensibly tasked with conducting a "Due Diligence Investigation" of me for his client FOX News; the ostensive rationale being that FOX News'
"concern about the dame"
[who, at that time (circa one month prior to 9/11) was a reporter for FOX 2 News (in St. Louis)]. The reporter in question (or someone using an e-mail account sub nom.
"Nancy Pasternak")
had sent me an e-mail asking whether I could (and impliedly if I would) access a student's e-mail account (I was then a webmaster at a medical school) in order to "help [her] out on a news story". [nb: I still have the printouts of
our e-mail correspondences, some eleven years later.] Since then, I've chanced to read various reports on
"9/11"
through the intervening years; many government officers have claimed e.g. "We were doing our best with scarce resources" — "We were harried and overworked" — "We were hamstrung by overly stovepiped
systems (or alternatively, "System of systems") of (inadequate) interagency cooperation" — a la that sort of oftime traditional "bureaucratese". Many government officials doubtless deserve to lay claim to such explanations as factors which militate toward excusing them from various charges of having "dropped their guard" in the face of an enemy (viz., "Al Qaeda") thereby inadvertantly increasing said enemy's odds, ceteris paribus, of successfully conducting its devastating asymmetrical attack which turned our civilian transport aircraft into guided air-to-ground missiles. Given such context, why was Mr. Shumate (whom I discovered only later had been charged at that time with significant counterterrorism duties at C.I.A.) questioning me a month before 9/11, when the purported subject mattter was a dame I'd taken a shine to, and didn't want to report as having asked me to engage in what I'd deemed to be criminal behavior (shades of "misprision of felony" risk on my part, a fortiori); and/or
his clients FOX News / News Corp.
— and whyever (by Mr. Shumate's startling admission during the "field-grade show trial") was he explicitly using oblique intimidation tactics? [E.g., at one point I'd said: "You're not here to investigate me; you're trying to intimidate me.", to which he replied: "Trying to?"; later on, he goaded me: "Are you a fighter?" (a rhetorical question which was pregnant, in my opinion, with intended "No win" implicature; a fortiori as he seemed to be nodding his head to the street as if challenging me to no more or less than "a tawdry ad hoc street fight").] Mr. Shumate was physically hefty, on my doorstep via element-of-surprise, and accompanied by a male stenographer and a local (St. Louis) police officer; he "held all the cards" so to speak and thus I had no choice but to conclude that discretion here was indeed the better part of valor. I eventually filed a FOIA Request ca. 2007 with the Central Intelligence Agency but (as they'd warned us about back in law school) all I received in response was a rather perfunctory form letter and a few checked boxes on a form, with words to the effect that I'd received no answers because President Bush had deemed it "a matter of national security". My POV: I was just seekin’ a date with a woman who looked like a queen; while Shumate seemed for
his part "a cagey bee".
|
